134
મ
"(a) they reaffirmed the Council's support of the conclusions of the 1946 Committee in London on the future plans for the University of Hong Kong, namely that either the University should be developed to serve as a worthy representation of British scholarship and an effective centre for Sino-British contact in the sphere of learning (which would require large-scale financial assistance from Imperial, not Colonial funds) or the University should not be revived;
(b)
because adequate Imperial funds for the development policy had not been made available.and because they considered that the Malayan scheme had priority of claim on the C. D. & W. higher education allocation, they could not support an application for using a substantial sum from the allocation on what were essentially rehabilitation schemes".
The Committee NOTED that applications on the lines Mr. Sloss's statement might be brought to the Committee icially for advice at a later stage.
IB
>
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.